So, I’m currently reading a book laced with feminist articles, and it’s highly amusing. The author, it appears, is attempting to justify the nonsensical nature of feminist rhetoric — and, by extension, the argumentative style of “hysterical women” (the author genuinely uses that term) — by claiming that logic and reason are the domain of “Masculine Discourse”, and that any woman who wishes to oppose the patriarchy must shed herself of these oppressive boundaries and go beyond logic and reason, into the emotional, “more meaningful” realm of “Feminine Discourse”. As evidence of this, she points out that the stereotype that women don’t talk plain is patriarchal oppression, because forcing women to utilise reason instead of “woman’s intuition” means forcing them to conform to the masculine way of thinking — logic, she argues, is a patriarchal construct and is therefore not necessary. This, apparently, makes it perfectly acceptable for an angry feminist to engage in an argument “in which she sets off in all directions, leaving ‘him’ unable to discern the coherence of any meaning.” Of course, this is all the man’s fault for adhering so adamantly to that damn patriarchal tool he calls “reason”, instead of adopting feminist emotional responses as his primary cognitive function. Damn him and his “logic”. Well, that explains everything, doesn’t it?
So logic is patriarchal and oppressive to women? I believe the implication that women are inherently illogical and driven by subjective, emotional reasoning is way more sexist. Nonetheless…
You’ve got to be shitting me. There are a lot of women I know who would be really insulted by assumptions and statements like that.
yes, this type of argument has been used in feminist and hence social justice circles for a long time. check out the entirety of SJ bible derailing-for-dummies, it categorically defends screaming at people like a spoilt toddler or insulting people on the basis of your ‘minority-ness’ and them being a patriarchal kyriarchal douchefucker for disagreeing with you (even if you know nothing about them whatsoever). they also claim that this kind of discourse is part of white male culture, so anyone who isn’t white can use the same illogic.
‘feminine discourse’ and screaming ‘tone’ every time someone points out their rudeness perfectly explains why none of these idiots will ever get anywhere meaningful and why they are such a joke.
Who is this woman?
I wanna drop a bomb of pure logic on her.
And I’m a girl.
omg can I use this argument next time someone claims I’m saying something illogical. ‘I’m not being crazy, I’m just using my woman’s intuition. Earth logic is so misogynistic!’
Feminists like this make me sad because I know they’re the reason everybody thinks feminists like me are crazy female supremacist gender separatist people :C
-
biognosis liked this
-
vegetarianlyfe reblogged this from captainjackjohnson
-
fromskulls liked this
-
simon-belmont liked this
-
hyena-in-pantaloons liked this
-
friendlysoviet liked this
-
twatriler liked this
-
warboss-dakka-gaijan answered:
feminists are opposed to logic? who would have thought….
-
allacharade answered:
I can has source? It would really help me in making this argument in the future.
-
fckthehighroad reblogged this from akejay and added:
So, I really want to know what OP was reading, because I’ve made the argument about some parts of feminism (including...
-
menospeekyenglish reblogged this from fucknoliberals and added:
The words of a Feminazi…
-
letthetruthlaugh reblogged this from fucknoliberals
-
thesinkingbelle answered:
fuck me
-
gaypher liked this
-
fucknoliberals reblogged this from captainjackjohnson
-
writeinthehead liked this
-
kynelly answered:
That offends every fibre of my being. As a woman who lives by the tenants of logic and reason, I find this to be a personal affront.
-
digitalmeowmix liked this
-
pleasedwithadaydream reblogged this from convertedinvader and added:
well fuck. everything on tumblr makes sense now.
-
delitahyral reblogged this from konekosilvertail and added:
my life where I’d write
-
konekosilvertail reblogged this from catbountry and added:
omg can I use this argument next time someone claims I’m saying something illogical. ‘I’m not being crazy, I’m just...
-
konekosilvertail liked this
-
kingrenlysghost liked this
-
weare-legion reblogged this from catbountry and added:
actually tried to argue with me with...for men, fear my emotional thrashing.”
-
its-life-and-life-only liked this
-
applebeansokay answered:
um
-
totallynotagentphilcoulson reblogged this from catbountry
-
akejay reblogged this from catbountry and added:
Hey guys not all feminists are crazy like this :( don’t assume things.
-
pros-consofbreathing reblogged this from bemme
-
badge-boy liked this
-
chronicroutine reblogged this from catbountry and added:
Oh look, another “Get...Jail Free” card. This...just as...
-
xtremecaffeine reblogged this from catbountry and added:
The flip-side, though, is the tone argument - the idea that if you can’t sit down and calmly dispassionately explain...
-
ruthlesscalculus liked this
-
symphonyofghosts liked this
-
poetessinthepit liked this
-
catbountry reblogged this from lorycannotsupinate and added:
Who is this woman? I wanna drop a bomb of pure logic on her. And I’m a girl.
-
rolypoly-dandy liked this
-
thealecdelgado answered:
(屮゚Д゚)屮
-
ca2mgfe5si8o22oh2 reblogged this from antesdachuva and added:
yeah, I’ve heard that before. there...certain research that suggests girls develop...
-
ca2mgfe5si8o22oh2 liked this
-
drencrome liked this
-
antesdachuva liked this
-
innercheeseburger liked this
-
permutationofninjasarchive reblogged this from gillionaire and added:
The worst thing is that I’ve actually seen people try to argue this in person.
-
soletherapy liked this
-
gillionaire reblogged this from sirbromanguyboy
- Show more notes
